Monsanto Tribunal Legal Opinion


 4 May, 2017 at 10.30 pm
National Press Club, Dhaka Bangladesh

Organised by Nayakrishi Andolon and UBINIG

A Press Briefing meeting is organised to share the Legal Opinion delivered by Judges of Monsanto Tribunal. The Monsanto Tribunal, an international civil society initiative to hold Monsanto accountable for human rights violations, for crimes against humanity, and for ecocide was held in the Hague, Netherlands during 15 - 16 October, 2016. Eminent judges heard over 30 witnesses, lawyers and experts. In April 2017, the Judges publicly delivered a legal opinion following procedures of the International Court of Justice. A distinct and parallel event, the People's Assembly, was a gathering of social movements from all over the world that exchanged ideas and planned for the future we want.

The tribunal concluded that:

  • Monsanto has violated human rights to food, health, a healthy environment and the freedom indispensable for independent scientific research.
  • ‘Ecocide’ should be recognized as a crime in international law
  • Human Rights and environmental laws are undermined by corporate-friendly trade and investment regulation.

The witnesses from US, Latin America, Europe, Africa, Australia and Asia testified how Monsanto has violated human rights and has committed crimes against the planet by aggressively promoting its products, lobbying politicians and attacking independent scientists. The Monsanto Tribunal confirmed how poisonous products and toxic chemicals such as Round Up (Glyphosate) & Basta (Glufosinate), neonicotinoids, atrazine, and other pesticides have led to the destruction of soils, to desertification, to the extermination of bees, to the rise in health epidemics such as cancer, birth defects, and respiratory disease. Specific cases of Bt Cotton in Africa and India were presented. A testimony was also presented from Bangladesh on Bt Brinjal issue.

Based on these testimonies, and considering both existing international law and on going legal initiatives aiming to improve the protection of human rights and the environment, the judges concluded that Monsanto has indeed infringed on the public’s rights to food, health, a healthy environment and the freedom indispensable for independent scientific research.

The Tribunal is also of the opinion that “international law should now precisely and clearly assert the protection of the environment and the crime of ecocide”. If such a crime of ecocide would be recognized in international criminal law, “the activities of Monsanto could possibly constitute a crime of ecocide”, the judges stated.

In their final conclusion, the judges highlighted the current imbalance in the international system, which offers much better protection to corporations and their financial interests (through trade and investment law including ISDS courts) than it does to human rights and the environment. It is now crucial for the UN to act on this widening gap, they warned, as “otherwise key questions will be resolved by private tribunals operating entirely outside the UN framework”.

The legal opinion of the Monsanto Tribunal is a moral resolution and confirms the need to assert the primacy of international human and environmental rights law in the international legal framework. International law should now precisely and clearly assert the protection of the environment and the crime of ecocide. The Tribunal concludes that if such a crime of Ecocide were recognized in international criminal law, the activities of Monsanto could possibly constitute a crime of ecocide. Civil society movements now have a new instrument and an eminent legal advisory opinion to enforce their actions to defend the rights of the Earth and of people.

List of witnesses in alphabetical order

1. Farida Akhter, policy analyst, Bangladesh

2. Krishan Bir Choudhary, scientist, India

3. Shiv Chopra, expert regulatory agency, Canada

4. Peter Clausing, toxicologist, Germany

5. María Colin, lawyer, Mexico

6. Art Dunham, veterinarian, USA

7. Angelica El Canché, beekeeper, Mexico

8. Diego Fernández, farmer, Argentina

9. Marcelo Firpo, public and environmental health researcher, Brazil

10. Paul François, farmer and victim, France

11. Sabine Grataloup, victim, France

12. Don Huber (represented by Art Dunham), biologist, USA

13. Channa Jayasumana, expert environmental health, Sri Lanka

14. Monika Krueger, veterinarian, Germany

15. Timothy Litzenburg, lawyer, USA

16. Miguel Lovera, agronomist, Paraguay

17. Steve Marsh, farmer, Australia

18. Pedro Pablo Mutumbajoy, victim, Colombia

19. Ib Borup Pedersen, pig farmer, Denmark

20. Juan Ignacio Pereyra, victim, Argentina

21. Claire Robinson, academic research, United Kingdom

22. Maria Liz Robledo, victim Roundup, Argentina

23. Kolon Saman, victim, Sri Lanka

24. Percy Schmeiser, farmer, Canada

25. Gilles-Eric Séralini (represented by Nicolas Defarge), academic research, France

26. Christine Sheppard, victim, USA

27. Ousmane Tiendrebeogo, farmer, Burkina Faso

28. Feliciano Ucán Poot, beekeeper, Mexico

29. Damián Verzeñassi, doctor public health, Argentina

 

List of legal experts in alphabetical order

1. William Bourdon

2. Claudia Gómez Godoy

3. Maogato Jackson

4. Gwynn McCarrick (represented by Maogato Jackson) and Koffi Dogbev

 


For Print Click Here


Comments Must Be Less Than 5000 Charachter